ISSN 2458-7834
 

Original Article 


The Pocket Method Gives Poor Results When Used for Fingertip Amputations with Bony Fragments

Ali Eray Günay, Kadir Tatlısu.


Abstract
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study is to investigate the mid-term results of subdermal pocket replantation without vessel repair on fingertip amputation cases with bone fragments.
Methods: In 2018-2019, nine patients’ eleven fingers whose fingertip amputation could not be repaired and be aplied subdermal pocketing were included in the study. Satisfaction level, range of motion, length and survival rate, two-point static discrimination and Semmes Weinstein monofilament test were applied.
Results: All of the patients included in the study were male and the mean age was 35.2 ± 13.5 years. The mean time between insertion and removal of the finger in the pocket is 16.45 ± 2.42 (14-21) days. The median of SMWT was 2.83 (2.83 – 6.65) and the mean of S2PD was 3.62 ± 0.38 (2.00 – 6.00) mm. The mean score of satisfaction was 65.9 ± 27.9 (0 – 100) out of hundred.
Three patients’ three fingers survived and this patients were named as group A, and the other 6 patients (8 fingers) were named as group B. The average survival rate of three patients was 71.7 ± 33.2%. There was no statistically significant difference between groups in terms of age, waiting time in the pocket, SWMT, S2PD and satisfaction scores.
Conclusions: Although pocket replantation method is an easy method to apply, it does not show perfect results in cases with bone fragments. It seems to be a viable method for providing venous drainage in fingertip amputations where artery repair can be performed but vein repair cannot be performed.

Key words: Pulp Defect, Tamai zone I, Subdermal Pocket Replantation, Finger Distal Amputation


 
ARTICLE TOOLS
Abstract
PDF Fulltext
How to cite this articleHow to cite this article
Citation Tools
Related Records
 Articles by Ali Eray Günay
Articles by Kadir Tatlısu
on Google
on Google Scholar


How to Cite this Article
Pubmed Style

Gunay AE, Tatlısu K. The Pocket Method Gives Poor Results When Used for Fingertip Amputations with Bony Fragments. Hand Microsurg. 2021; 10(3): 255-259. doi:10.5455/handmicrosurg.72804


Web Style

Gunay AE, Tatlısu K. The Pocket Method Gives Poor Results When Used for Fingertip Amputations with Bony Fragments. https://handmicrosurgeryjournal.com/?mno=72804 [Access: September 14, 2024]. doi:10.5455/handmicrosurg.72804


AMA (American Medical Association) Style

Gunay AE, Tatlısu K. The Pocket Method Gives Poor Results When Used for Fingertip Amputations with Bony Fragments. Hand Microsurg. 2021; 10(3): 255-259. doi:10.5455/handmicrosurg.72804



Vancouver/ICMJE Style

Gunay AE, Tatlısu K. The Pocket Method Gives Poor Results When Used for Fingertip Amputations with Bony Fragments. Hand Microsurg. (2021), [cited September 14, 2024]; 10(3): 255-259. doi:10.5455/handmicrosurg.72804



Harvard Style

Gunay, A. E. & Tatlısu, . K. (2021) The Pocket Method Gives Poor Results When Used for Fingertip Amputations with Bony Fragments. Hand Microsurg, 10 (3), 255-259. doi:10.5455/handmicrosurg.72804



Turabian Style

Gunay, Ali Eray, and Kadir Tatlısu. 2021. The Pocket Method Gives Poor Results When Used for Fingertip Amputations with Bony Fragments. Hand and Microsurgery, 10 (3), 255-259. doi:10.5455/handmicrosurg.72804



Chicago Style

Gunay, Ali Eray, and Kadir Tatlısu. "The Pocket Method Gives Poor Results When Used for Fingertip Amputations with Bony Fragments." Hand and Microsurgery 10 (2021), 255-259. doi:10.5455/handmicrosurg.72804



MLA (The Modern Language Association) Style

Gunay, Ali Eray, and Kadir Tatlısu. "The Pocket Method Gives Poor Results When Used for Fingertip Amputations with Bony Fragments." Hand and Microsurgery 10.3 (2021), 255-259. Print. doi:10.5455/handmicrosurg.72804



APA (American Psychological Association) Style

Gunay, A. E. & Tatlısu, . K. (2021) The Pocket Method Gives Poor Results When Used for Fingertip Amputations with Bony Fragments. Hand and Microsurgery, 10 (3), 255-259. doi:10.5455/handmicrosurg.72804





Most Viewed Articles
Most Accessed Articles

  • Giant intramuscular lipoma of arm: A case report and review of the literature
    Muzaffer Durmus, Ahmet Demirhan Dal, Abdul Kerim Yapici, Sedat Avsar, Yalcin Bayram
    Hand Microsurg. 2014; 3(3): 87-90
    » Abstract » doi: 10.5455/handmicrosurg.173820

  • Cubital tunnel syndrome due to heterotrophic ossification caused by radial head fracture: A case report
    Seyitali Gumustas, Haci Bayram Tosun, Ismail Agir, Abuzer Uludag
    Hand Microsurg. 2014; 3(1): 24-28
    » Abstract » doi: 10.5455/handmicrosurg.1577

  • Munchausen’s syndrome or pure self-mutilation? A case of self-inflicted tendon injury
    Burak Kaya, Servet Elcin Alpat, Mehmet Sonmez, Cem Cerkez, Savas Serel
    Hand Microsurg. 2014; 3(3): 83-86
    » Abstract » doi: 10.5455/handmicrosurg.172607

  • Radial nerve grafting in high energy humeral fractures
    Yusuf Gürbüz, Tahir Sadık Sügün, Kemal Özaksar, Murat Kayalar, Tulgar Toros, İbrahim Kaplan
    Hand Microsurg. 2012; 1(2): 60-64
    » Abstract » doi: 10.2399/emd.12.58077

  • The utility of onion extract gel containing topical allantoin and heparin after surgical treatment of upper extremity burn scars
    Mehmet Ihsan Okur, Alpagan Mustafa Yildirim, Bilsev Ince
    Hand Microsurg. 2014; 3(3): 74-79
    » Abstract » doi: 10.5455/handmicrosurg.172436

  • Most Downloaded
    Top Downloaded Articles

  • Bone island and hand involvement – A short review
    Ganesh Singh Dharmshaktu, Binit Singh
    Hand Microsurg. 2018; 7(2): 93-97
    » Abstract » doi: 10.5455/handmicrosurg.258665

  • Lipofibromatous hamartoma of the digital nerve: A case report
    Emin Sir, Alper Aksoy
    Hand Microsurg. 2018; 7(1): 45-48
    » Abstract » doi: 10.5455/handmicrosurg.255406

  • Love sign’s love for glomus tumor
    Ankit Shukla, Varun Verma, Roshni Shukla, Rajesh Chaudhary, Saurab Sharma, Sajid Mohammad
    Hand Microsurg. 2018; 7(2): 105-108
    » Abstract » doi: 10.5455/handmicrosurg.279749

  • Synovial chondromatosis of the wrist
    Murat Kayalar, Abuzer Uludag, Basak Doganavsargil Yakut, Ahmet Savran
    Hand Microsurg. 2018; 7(2): 109-111
    » Abstract » doi: 10.5455/handmicrosurg.269392

  • The three bony point relationship of the elbow-Why is there still a lack of consensus?
    Supreeth Nekkanti, Dama Kondaiah Naidu, Jasmine Sebastin, Kamal Prasad, Mohan Yeshwanth, Archana Meka
    Hand Microsurg. 2018; 7(2): 79-82
    » Abstract » doi: 10.5455/handmicrosurg.291476

  • Most Cited Articles
    Most Cited Articles