Open Access and Peer-reviewed
Home Journal Issues Guide for Authors Editorial Board Aims & Scope About Journal News & Announcements


Original Article 


Comparison of conservative and extension block pinning methods in the treatment of bony mallet finger injuries

Ali řahin, Esra Demirel, řahin «epni, Mesut Tahta.

Abstract
Purpose: The aim of the study was to compare and determine the effectiveness of conservative splint treatment and surgical extension block pinning treatment of mallet fractures containing more than one-third of the articular surface.
Methods: The study included 39 patients who were diagnosed with acute closed bony mallet finger of which the fracture line contained at least one-third of the articular surface, treated between January 2017 and January 2020. Of the patients, 23 (16 men and 7 women) were treated surgically with the extension block pinning method and 16 (12 men and 4 women) were treated with the hyperextension finger splint. Patients with a follow-up period of at least one year were evaluated. The patients were compared based on their Crawford mallet finger outcome assessment criteria, Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire scores and joint restriction limitations. Data were analyzed with the SPSS 21 package program. The significance level was p<0.05.
Results: The mean age in the conservative group 29.81 Ī 9.89 (18-51) and the mean follow-up duration was 26.87 Ī 9.53(12-38) months. The mean age in the EBP group was 36.83 Ī 13.72 (18-64) years and the mean follow-up duration was 31.61 Ī 9.05(14-41) months. According to the Crawford assessment criteria, the patients in the EBP group had the following outcomes: excellent in 7 patients (30.4%), good in 3 patients (13%), fair in 11 patients (8.7%), and poor in 2 patients (8.7%). In the conservative group, 4 (25%) patients had excellent outcome, 4 (25%) had good outcome, 6 (37.5%) had fair outcome and 2 (12.5%) had poor outcome. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of MHOQ scores.
Conclusion: In conclusion, it was found that there are no differences between surgical and conservative treatments after bony mallet finger injuries in terms of functional outcomes but permanent complication and flexion limitation are more common after surgical treatment while active extension limitation is more common after the conservative treatment. According to this information, the individual treatment approach should be adapted considering the variables like the patient's age and profession.

Key words: mallet finger, extension block pinning, splinting


 
ARTICLE TOOLS
Abstract
PDF Fulltext
How to cite this articleHow to cite this article
Citation Tools
Related Records
 Articles by Ali řahin
Articles by Esra Demirel
Articles by řahin «epni
Articles by Mesut Tahta
on Google
on Google Scholar


How to Cite this Article
Pubmed Style

Ali řahin|Esra Demirel|řahin «epni|Mesut Tahta|. Comparison of conservative and extension block pinning methods in the treatment of bony mallet finger injuries. doi:10.5455/handmicrosurg.52553


Web Style

Ali řahin|Esra Demirel|řahin «epni|Mesut Tahta|. Comparison of conservative and extension block pinning methods in the treatment of bony mallet finger injuries. http://handmicrosurgeryjournal.com/?mno=52553 [Access: April 18, 2021]. doi:10.5455/handmicrosurg.52553


AMA (American Medical Association) Style

Ali řahin|Esra Demirel|řahin «epni|Mesut Tahta|. Comparison of conservative and extension block pinning methods in the treatment of bony mallet finger injuries. doi:10.5455/handmicrosurg.52553



Vancouver/ICMJE Style

Ali řahin|Esra Demirel|řahin «epni|Mesut Tahta|. Comparison of conservative and extension block pinning methods in the treatment of bony mallet finger injuries. doi:10.5455/handmicrosurg.52553



Harvard Style

Ali řahin|Esra Demirel|řahin «epni|Mesut Tahta| (0) Comparison of conservative and extension block pinning methods in the treatment of bony mallet finger injuries. doi:10.5455/handmicrosurg.52553



Turabian Style

Ali řahin|Esra Demirel|řahin «epni|Mesut Tahta|. 0. Comparison of conservative and extension block pinning methods in the treatment of bony mallet finger injuries. doi:10.5455/handmicrosurg.52553



Chicago Style

Ali řahin|Esra Demirel|řahin «epni|Mesut Tahta|. "Comparison of conservative and extension block pinning methods in the treatment of bony mallet finger injuries." doi:10.5455/handmicrosurg.52553



MLA (The Modern Language Association) Style

Ali řahin|Esra Demirel|řahin «epni|Mesut Tahta|. "Comparison of conservative and extension block pinning methods in the treatment of bony mallet finger injuries." doi:10.5455/handmicrosurg.52553



APA (American Psychological Association) Style

Ali řahin|Esra Demirel|řahin «epni|Mesut Tahta| (0) Comparison of conservative and extension block pinning methods in the treatment of bony mallet finger injuries. doi:10.5455/handmicrosurg.52553








AUTHOR LOGIN

REVIEWER LOGIN

Indexed
&
Abstracted


DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals)

EuroPub Database

Hinari (World Health Organization)

Ulakbim

ScopeMed

Google Scholar

WordCat

 

 


ABOUT JOURNAL
POLICIES
STATEMENTS

This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition of open access.

The articles in Hand and Microsurgery are open access articles licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.